Skip to main content
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
As archaeological management practices change and evolve, there has been an increasing move towards implementing avoidance mitigation strategies for significant archaeological sites. In Ontario the pressure to make this change has come... more
As archaeological management practices change and evolve, there has been an increasing move towards implementing avoidance mitigation strategies for significant archaeological sites. In Ontario the pressure to make this change has come from a number of directions and sources, including from First Nations groups and stakeholder groups looking to preserve archaeological sites, MTCS policy and practice documents which encourage site preservation and financial pressures like the desire to spend tax dollars more efficiently.  Provincial bodies which administer large areas which contain archaeological resources, like the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) are particularly engaged with these practices, and constantly seek to find the balance between cost and benefit in the management of cultural heritage resources, including archaeological sites. Determining what constitutes a “significant” site, determining what level of impact is acceptable to sites, and the costs and benefits of avoiding excavation versus significantly altering the design of projects are at the core of this pursuit for MTO. In addition, MTO and other Provincial bodies are tasked with consulting meaningfully with First Nations groups in an attempt to find solutions to these problems. This paper explores these questions, drawing specific examples from MTO highway design and asset management projects in Central Ontario.

*please contact me if you are interested in a copy of this paper or to discuss the topics via PM
This represents the combined reading copy of the paper and the powerpoint presentation
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
with Ashley Mendes and Gareth Newfield.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Download (.pdf)
Research Interests:
Download (.pdf)
Paper / Lecture presented at the University of Toronto Archaeology Centre
Research Interests:
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
Research Interests:
Download (.pdf)
Technical archaeological  report filed in advance of infrastructural improvements at the Royal Military College of Canada.
Research Interests:
Download (.pdf)
An archaeological  technical report submitted to Defence Construction Canada in advance of infrastructural improvements at Fort Frederick, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario.
Download (.pdf)